Referendum Shows Most Undergraduate Respondents Oppose Brown University Leadership

The results of a new vote suggest many undergraduates lack faith in the school’s governing body

File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
Olivia Ebertz/The Public’s Radio
1 min read
Share
File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
File photo. A group of Brown University students face University Hall at a pro-Palestinian protest in November 2023.
Olivia Ebertz/The Public’s Radio
Referendum Shows Most Undergraduate Respondents Oppose Brown University Leadership
Copy

According to a referendum distributed by Brown’s Undergraduate Council of Students, 73% of undergraduate respondents are unhappy with Brown University’s corporate leadership and would like at least one person on the Brown Corporate Board representing undergraduates. The council said that 26% of the undergraduate student body responded to the referendum.

The students who conducted the referendum say it shows a deep divide between the student body and the university’s leadership, who have been at odds over pro-Palestinian activism on campus for over a year now. But Brian Clark, a spokesperson for the university, said the referendum offers the opinion of just “a portion of one specific group of constituents,” and underscored that the results do not require the school to take any action. Any changes to the structure of Brown’s governance would have to be approved by the current board, Clark said.

Isaac Slevin is a member of the Undergraduate Student Council. He said that besides showing students’ upset over the Brown Corporation’s decision not to divest from companies students say profit from human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories, the results also highlight that students would like more meaningful decision-making power, beyond being members of advisory bodies and other forms of campus governance that currently exist.

“There’s less incentive to engage in these performative committees,” said Slevin.

This story was reported by The Public’s Radio. You can read the entire story here.

Approved two-year extension to pilot program revives past opposition
From a “Hot Printing” class to running a thriving graphic design company, a Providence couple’s passion for design and their cultural roots have shaped their creative journey together
From Brown’s student journalism on administrative bloat to RISD’s removal of anti-Zionist art, Rhode Island universities are grappling with the tensions between free expression and political sensitivity
Book lovers strengthen community through in-person events and activities
Livestream: The Public's Radio

Livestream: The Public's Radio