Ethics Commission Offers One ‘Yes’ and One ‘No’ on Legislative Conflicts of Interest

Rep. Arthur Corvese, left, a North Providence Democrat, and Rep. Paul Santucci, right, a Smithfield Republican, each sought opinions from the Rhode Island Ethics Commission regarding potential conflicts of interest.
Rep. Arthur Corvese, left, a North Providence Democrat, and Rep. Paul Santucci, right, a Smithfield Republican, each sought opinions from the Rhode Island Ethics Commission regarding potential conflicts of interest.
Courtesy Rhode Island General Assembly and Paul Santucci for State Representative
1 min read
Share
Rep. Arthur Corvese, left, a North Providence Democrat, and Rep. Paul Santucci, right, a Smithfield Republican, each sought opinions from the Rhode Island Ethics Commission regarding potential conflicts of interest.
Rep. Arthur Corvese, left, a North Providence Democrat, and Rep. Paul Santucci, right, a Smithfield Republican, each sought opinions from the Rhode Island Ethics Commission regarding potential conflicts of interest.
Courtesy Rhode Island General Assembly and Paul Santucci for State Representative
Ethics Commission Offers One ‘Yes’ and One ‘No’ on Legislative Conflicts of Interest
Copy

The state ethics panel has given the OK for one state representative to vote on the fiscal 2026 budget but put the kibosh on another lawmaker’s ability to advocate for his landlord’s development plans.

The pair of advisory opinions issued by the Rhode Island Ethics Commission on Tuesday address inquiries regarding potential personal or professional conflicts by state legislators.

Rep. Arthur Corvese, a North Providence Democrat, sought the commission’s opinion regarding his son-in-law’s job with Meta. Gov. Dan McKee as part of his fiscal 2026 budget has proposed taxing global companies on the income they derive from digital advertisements in Rhode Island, which directly relates to Corvese’s son-in-law’s job as Meta policy director. Corvese already pledged in his written submission to recuse himself from any committee hearings at which his son-in-law, or one of his supervisees, testifies. But Corvese was unsure whether he could vote on the fiscal 2026 budget as a whole, should the final version include the proposed 10% digital advertising tax. The commission’s opinion gives Corvese permission to vote on the budget as a whole — though not individual line items pertaining to the tax — noting that Meta and his son-in-law’s financial standing is unchanged by the state’s tax proposal.

However, the commission did not give a similar rubber stamp to another state representative’s inquiry regarding his business landlord’s development plans.

In a separate advisory opinion, the commission concluded that Rep. Paul Santucci, a Smithfield Republican, could not comment on or vote on any legislation related to his company landlord’s plans to develop a 300-acre industrial park in his district because the pair are business associates. No legislation regarding the planned development has been introduced, so the question for now remains hypothetical. Should a bill be submitted, Santucci should recuse himself from the vote or seek further input from the commission.

Neither Corvese nor Santucci immediately returned inquiries for comment on Thursday.

This story was originally published by the Rhode Island Current.

Three-hour hearing in environmental nonprofits lawsuit centers on powers of federal agencies
Rep. Magaziner calls for voters to keep speaking up
Local farmer’s markets may help, according to food policy advocates
After four years of development, the Samaritans’ new website combines mental health resources with calming artwork to provide a welcoming, life-saving experience for those in need of support
Transit riders say moving the Kennedy Plaza bus hub is the last thing RIPTA should be focusing on while it still has a more than $30 million funding hole to fill
Rhode Island U.S. Rep. Magaziner says mass layoffs at agency are ‘outright dangerous’
Former Providence Journal sports writer will be honored during the NCAA Final Four